Tag Archive for 'bridges'

Highway Trust Fund Problems Are Political, Not Structural, ARTBA Tells Congress

image002The root of the federal Highway Trust Fund’s (HTF) revenue challenge is not an antiquated gas tax or alternative-fueled vehicles dominating the U.S. automobile fleet or improved fuel economy, but a more direct and obvious flaw: the federal motor fuels tax and other highway user fees have not been adjusted for 20 years.”  That’s the key message the American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA) delivered today to members of Congress during a House Budget Committee hearing on the state of the HTF.

In written testimony, ARTBA noted 2012’s highway/transit law—MAP-21—had a revenue title that provided no more than a short-term stabilization for the federal surface transportation programs, and within 17 months Congress will once again be faced with the reality of existing revenues being insufficient to maintain investment levels.

“Policy makers will have three straight-forward choices; dramatically cut federal highway and public transportation investment and threaten hundreds of thousands of jobs, continue the recent trend of supplementing trust fund revenues with general funds and, in so doing, add to the deficit, or generate new revenues,” ARTBA said.

ARTBA’s testimony noted the federal government’s responsibility for supporting interstate commerce is clearly laid out in the U.S. Constitution, and the nation’s highway network is the manifestation of such constitutional responsibility in that it facilitates the movement of people and goods between the states.

Addressing the HTF’s shortfall is a “political dilemma, not a structural or functional shortcoming,” according to ARTBA.  “There are many viable approaches to generate new revenues to support federal surface transportation investments.  House Republicans reinforced this fact in the last Congress when they sought to generate new revenues for the Highway Trust Fund by linking domestic energy exploration with infrastructure investment,” said the group.

The association called on Congress to include a long-term revenue solution to stabilize and grow HTF’s revenues as part of a comprehensive reform to the U.S. tax code.  “Such an action would not only aid in deficit reduction by eliminating the trust fund’s burden on the general fund, but it would support investment in tangible assets that would support economic growth for years to come,” ARTBA said.

Click: View  for the the complete text of ARTBA’s testimony.

ARTBA Participates in National Work Zone Awareness Week April 16 Kick Off Event

“Roadway Work Zone Safety: We’re All in This Together,” is the theme of 2013 National Work Zone Awareness Week (NWZAW), which kicked-off today with a news conference at a road construction site near the American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA) Headquarters in Washington, D.C.  The annual, week-long event raises awareness of the need to drive cautiously in work zones and calls on drivers to help protect highway workers during the busy construction season.

Manuel Rodrigues, vice president of Metro Paving Corp., the contractor managing the project, represented ARTBA at the event, during which victims and their families placed ceremonial black ribbons on orange safety cones and observed a moment of silence for those who lost their lives helping to build and repair U.S. roads.

Roadway work zone accident victim Alice Ward shares her story during the 
National Work Zone Awareness Week kick-off event in Washington, D.C.

Safety in roadway work zones is a serious, but often overlooked, public health issue, with an average of 600 people killed and nearly 40,000 injured annually in accidents at these sites.  More than 100 of these fatalities are construction workers.

This year’s theme aims to reduce these numbers by highlighting the complexities of work zones, especially in urban areas, and the need for greater awareness and better planning on the part of everyone affected by work zones, including state agencies, road workers, drivers, bicyclists, motorcycles, pedestrians, emergency response, law enforcement and utility workers.

The ARTBA Foundation-managed National Work Zone Safety Information Clearinghouse is one of the key sponsors of the week’s activities, along with other key industry organizations including the Federal Highway Administration , American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials and the American Traffic Safety Services Association .

Founded in 1998, the Clearinghouse provides a centralized information source on “all things” safety and makes its resources available “24/7.”  The facility (www.workzonesafety.org ) is now the world’s largest online work zone safety resource; handling more than 200,000 requests annually.

ARTBA Analysis of the Obama Administration’s FY 2014 Budget Proposal for Transportation

logo_toplogo logo_topEditor: Hank Webster

For months, President Obama has been talking about the importance of increased transportation investment, both to support the economic recovery and to strengthen the long-term outlook for the U.S. economy.  The FY 2014 budget proposal for the federal government—submitted by the administration to Congress April 10 puts flesh to the rhetoric by proposing substantial funding increases for federal transportation investment in FY 2014 and beyond. However, the failure of the administration to recommend a realistic source of funds to support its investment proposals suggests that, beyond funding for the core transportation investment programs, the President’s transportation budget requests will run into resistance in Congress.

The main proposals include:

  • Immediate Transportation Investments.  The budget proposes a one-time $50 billion appropriation for immediate transportation improvements in FY 2014, including $40 billion for “Fix-it-First” investments to improve existing infrastructure assets most in need of repair and $10 billion to help spur states and local innovation in infrastructure improvements.  Similar proposals in the past have not been acted on by Congress.
  • Federal Highway Program.  In the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21), Congress enacted an obligation ceiling of $40.256 billion for the federal highway program for FY 2014 plus $739 billion of contract authority and emergency relief funding that is not subject to the limitation, for a total of $40.995 billion.  The President’s budget request is identical to MAP-21.
  • Public Transportation.  MAP-21 authorized a total of $10.695 billion for the public transportation program for FY 2014, including $1.907 billion for capital investment grants, also known as the New Starts Program.  The budget requests $10.91 billion for the public transportation program, including $1.98 billion for the transit New Starts Program, which is slightly more than the amount enacted in MAP-21.
  • Airport Improvement Program.  The FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 authorizes $3.35 billion for the Airport Improvement Program for FY 2014, which provides grants to airports for capital improvements to runways and related projects.  The budget proposes to reduce this to $2.90 billion by eliminating funding for large hub airports and allowing these airports to increase passenger facility charges to finance their own airport improvements.
  • Partnership to Rebuild America.  In recent speeches, President Obama has proposed a “Partnership to Rebuild America” that calls for establishing a $10 billion National Infrastructure Bank, new “America Fast Forward (AFF) Bonds,” expansion of the “Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act” (TIFIA) and “Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery” (TIGER) programs, lifting the national cap and expand eligibility for “Private Activity Bonds” (PABs), and changing the tax treatment of foreign pension funds to attract increased investment.
  • TIFIA.  MAP-21 increased funding for the TIFIA program from $122 million in FY 2012 to $750 million in FY 2013 and $1 billion in FY 2014.  The President’s budget request includes the full $1 billion for FY 2014.

The following table summarizes the President’s budget proposal for the core transportation investment programs for FY 2014.

Program MAP-21, FAA Act Budget Request
Federal Highway Program Obligation Limitation $40.256 billion $40.256 billion
Highway Contract Authority Not Subject to the Limitation $739 million $739 million
Public Transportation Program, total $10. 695 billion $10.91 billion
   Inc. Capital Investment Grants $1.907 billion $1.981 billion
Airport Improvement Program $3.35 billion $2.90 billion
Highway Safety Programs $1.252 billion $1.252 billion
TIFIA loan program $1.0 billion $1.0 billion
GF transfer to HTF $12.6 billion $12.6 billion

To read ARTBA’s full analysis of the administration’s proposal, please click here

TRIP Reports: Las Vegas Area Drivers Waste Nearly $1,500 Each Year Driving On Deficient Roads – A Total Of $2.1 Billion Statewide. Fifty-Six Percent Of Las Vegas Area Roads Need Improvement, Area Drivers Lose 44 Hours Annually In Congestion

TRIPAt a time when the state faces a large and growing transportation funding shortfall, more than half of Nevada’s major locally and state-maintained roads are in either poor or mediocre condition, vehicle travel has grown at the fastest rate in the nation, and Nevada drivers experience growing congestion and delays. In addition to deteriorated roads and bridges, Nevada’s rural roads have a significantly higher traffic fatality rate than all other roads in the state. Increased investment in transportation improvements could improve road and bridge conditions, ease congestion, boost safety, and support long-term economic growth in Nevada, according to a new report released today by TRIP, a Washington, DC based national transportation organization. The TRIP report, Nevada Transportation by the Numbers: Meeting the State’s Need for Safe and Efficient Mobility,” provides data on key transportation facts and figures in the state.

 

$2.1 billion

TRIP estimates that Nevada roadways that lack some desirable safety features, have inadequate capacity to meet travel demands or have poor pavement conditions cost the state’s residents approximately $2.1 billion annually in the form of additional vehicle operating costs, the cost of lost time and wasted fuel due to traffic congestion and traffic crashes.

 

$2 billion

 

$3.4 billion

Estimates by the Nevada Department of Transportation (NDOT) calculate that the current backlog to repair all state maintained roads and bridges in Nevada is approximately $2 billion.  Under current funding, the backlog is expected to increase to $3.4 billion by 2025.
 

$1,464

 

$1,698

Driving on roads that are congested, deteriorated and that lack some desirable safety features costs the average Las Vegas area driver $1,464 annually. The average driver in the Reno-Carson City urban area loses $1,698 each year due to driving on deficient, congested roads.

51%

56%

86%

Fifty-one percent of Nevada’s major locally and state-maintained urban roads and highways are either in poor or mediocre condition.  Fifty-six percent of Las Vegas-area major locally and state- maintained urban roads are in poor or mediocre condition. In the Reno-Carson City area, 86 percent of roads are in poor or mediocre condition.

289

1,443

From 2007 to 2011, on average 289 people were killed annually in Nevada traffic crashes, a total of 1,443 fatalities over the five year period.

 

2X

The fatality rate on Nevada’s non-interstate rural roads is nearly two times higher than on all other roads in the state (1.91 fatalities per 100 million vehicle miles of travel vs. 0.98).

 

12

A total of 12 percent of Nevada bridges are in need of repair, improvement or replacement. Two percent of the state’s bridges are structurally deficient and ten percent are functionally obsolete.

137 %

1st

Vehicle miles of travel in Nevada increased 137 percent from 1990 to 2011, the largest increase in vehicle travel in the nation.

1,700,829

There are 1,700,829 licensed drivers in Nevada.

 

$1.00 = $5.20

The Federal Highway Administration estimates that each dollar spent on road, highway and bridge improvements results in an average benefit of $5.20 in the form of reduced vehicle maintenance costs, reduced delays, reduced fuel consumption, improved safety, reduced road and bridge maintenance costs, and reduced emissions as a result of improved traffic flow.

“The gap between the available funding and Nevada’s highway needs continues to grow every time our highway infrastructure is assessed. We must invest in our infrastructure again to enable our economy to grow, diversify and stay competitive,” said Darrell Armuth, stakeholder of the Nevada Highway Users Coalition.

Nevada roadways that lack some desirable safety features, have inadequate capacity to meet travel demands or have poor pavement conditions cost the state’s residents approximately $2.1 billion each year in the form of additional vehicle operating costs, the cost of lost time and wasted fuel due to traffic congestion, and traffic crashes. Driving on roads that are congested, deteriorated and that lack some desirable safety features costs the average Las Vegas area driver $1,464 annually.

According to the TRIP report, 51 percent of Nevada’s major locally and state-maintained roads are in either poor or mediocre condition. In the Las Vegas metro area, 56 percent of roads are in poor or mediocre condition. A total of 12 percent of Nevada’s bridges show significant deterioration or do not meet modern design standards. Two percent of the state’s bridges are structurally deficient. Structurally deficient bridges have significant deterioration of the bridge deck, supports or other major components. An additional 10 percent of Nevada’s bridges are functionally obsolete. These bridges no longer meet current highway design standards, often because of narrow lanes, inadequate clearances or poor alignment.

Growing traffic congestion, particularly in the state’s urban areas, threatens to choke commuting and commerce. The average commuter in the Las Vegas metro area loses 44 hours each year stuck in congestion.

Traffic crashes in Nevada claimed the lives of 1,443 people between 2007 and 2011. The state’s traffic fatality rate of 1.16 fatalities per 100 million vehicle miles of travel (VMT) is higher than the national average of 1.11 fatalities per 100 million VMT. However, the traffic fatality rate in 2010 on Nevada’s non-Interstate rural roads was 1.91 traffic fatalities per 100 million vehicle miles of travel, nearly two times higher than the 0.98 traffic fatalities per 100 million vehicle miles of travel on all other roads and highways in the state. Roadway features are likely a contributing factor in approximately one-third of all fatal and serious traffic crashes. Where appropriate, highway improvements can reduce traffic fatalities and crashes while improving traffic flow to help relieve congestion.

“These key transportation numbers in Nevada add up to trouble for the state’s residents in terms of deteriorated roads and bridges, reduced traffic safety and constrained economic development,” said Will Wilkins, executive director of TRIP.  “Improving road and bridge conditions, improving traffic safety and providing a transportation system that will support economic development in Nevada will require a significant boost in state and federal funding for road, highway and bridge improvements.”

NEVADA TRANSPORTATION BY THE NUMBERS:

Meeting the State’s Need for Safe and Efficient Mobility

Executive Summary

Nevada’s extensive system of roads, highways and bridges provides the state’s residents, visitors and businesses with a high level of mobility and forms the backbone that supports the state’s economy. Nevada’s surface transportation system enables the state’s residents and visitors to travel to work and school, visit family and friends, and frequent tourist and recreation attractions while providing its businesses with reliable access to customers, materials, suppliers and employees.

As Nevada looks to retain its businesses, maintain its level of economic competitiveness and achieve further economic growth, the state will need to maintain and modernize its roads, highways and bridges by improving the physical condition of its transportation network and enhancing the system’s ability to provide efficient and reliable mobility for motorists and businesses.  Making needed improvements to Nevada’s roads, highways and bridges could also provide a significant boost to the state’s economy by creating jobs in the short-term and stimulating long-term economic growth as a result of enhanced mobility and access.

With an unemployment rate of 9.7 percent and with the state’s population continuing to grow, Nevada must improve its system of roads, highways and bridges to foster economic growth and keep businesses in the state. In addition to economic growth, transportation improvements are needed to ensure safe, reliable mobility and quality of life for all Nevadans.  Meeting Nevada’s need to modernize and maintain its system of roads, highways and bridges will require a significant boost in local, state and federal funding.

An inadequate transportation system costs Nevada residents a total of $2.1 billion every year in the form of additional vehicle operating costs (VOC), congestion-related delays and traffic crashes.

  • TRIP estimates that Nevada roadways that lack some desirable safety features, have inadequate capacity to meet travel demands or have poor pavement conditions cost the state’s residents approximately $2.1 billion annually in the form of additional vehicle operating costs, the cost of lost time and wasted fuel due to traffic congestion, and traffic crashes.
  • TRIP has calculated the annual cost to Nevada residents of driving on roads that are deteriorated, congested and lack some desirable safety features both statewide and in the state’s largest urban area.  The following chart shows the cost breakdown for these areas.

Nevada faces a growing transportation funding shortfall. Estimates by the Nevada Department of Transportation (NDOT) calculate that the current backlog to repair all state maintained roads, highways and bridges in Nevada is approximately $2 billion.

  • A bi-annual state report released in early 2013 by the Nevada Department of Transportation found that there is a significant backlog in needed repairs on Nevada’s state-maintained roads, highways and bridges. These state-maintained roads, highways and bridges are a critical component of the state’s transportation system, accounting for 20 percent of the state’s road mileage, but carrying 54 percent of all vehicle miles of travel and 80 percent of all large truck travel in the state.
  • The report found that currently 23 percent of state-maintained roads and highways in Nevada need major rehabilitation and that the current backlog to repair all state maintained roads and bridges is approximately $2 billion, with $1.9 billion being for pavement preservation and the remainder for needed bridge repairs.
  • The report noted that the backlog for needed road, highway and bridge repairs has increased significantly since 2011 when it was $1.36 billion and that under current levels of funding the preservation backlog to repair state-maintained roads, highways and bridges in the state is expected to increase to $3.4 billion by 2025. The report estimated that eliminating the backlog of needed repairs on Nevada’s state-maintained roads, highways and bridges would require an additional investment of $285 million annually through 2025.

Population and economic growth in Nevada have resulted in increased demands on the state’s major roads and highways, leading to increased wear and tear on the transportation system. 

  • Nevada had the largest increase in population in the nation between 1990 and 2012. Nevada’s population reached 2.7 million in 2012, a 125 percent increase since 1990, when the state’s population was approximately 1.2 million.
  • Nevada had 1,700,829licensed drivers in 2011.
  • Vehicle miles traveled in Nevada increased by 137 percent from 1990 to 2011, the largest increase in the nation during that time. Vehicle travel in Nevada jumped from 10.2 billion vehicle miles traveled (VMT) in 1990 to 24.2 billion VMT in 2011.
  • By 2030, vehicle travel in Nevada is projected to increase by another 50 percent.
  • From 1990 to 2011, Nevada’s gross domestic product, a measure of the state’s economic output, increased by 138 percent, when adjusted for inflation 

Approximately half of major locally and state-maintained, urban roads and highways in Nevada have pavement surfaces in poor or mediocre condition, providing a rough ride and costing motorist in the form of additional vehicle operating costs. 

  • Sixteen percent of Nevada’s major urban roads and highways have pavements in poor condition, while an additional 35 percent of the state’s major roads are rated in mediocre condition.
  • The pavement data in this report for all arterial roads and highways is provided by the Federal Highway Administration, based on data submitted annually by the Nevada Department of Transportation (NDOT) on the condition of major state and locally maintained roads and highways in the state
  • In the Las Vegas urban area, 11 percent of major locally and state-maintained roads are rated in poor condition and 45 percent are rated in mediocre condition.  Fifteen percent of Las Vegas’ major urban roads are rated in fair condition and 29 percent are rated in good condition.
  • In the Reno-Carson City urban area, 55 percent of major locally and state-maintained roads are rated in poor condition and 31 percent are rated in mediocre condition.  Two percent of the Reno-Carson City major urban roads are rated in fair condition and 12 percent are rated in good condition.
  • Roads rated in poor condition may show signs of deterioration, including rutting, cracks and potholes.  In some cases, poor roads can be resurfaced, but often are too deteriorated and must be reconstructed. Roads rated in mediocre condition may show signs of significant wear and may also have some visible pavement distress. Most pavements in mediocre condition can be repaired by resurfacing, but some may need more extensive reconstruction to return them to good condition.
  • Driving on rough roads costs Nevada motorist a total of $538 million annually in extra vehicle operating costs. Costs include accelerated vehicle depreciation, additional repair costs, and increased fuel consumption and tire wear.
  • Driving on rough roads costs the average Las Vegas motorist $365 annually in extra vehicle operating costs.
  • The average driver in the Reno-Carson City urban area loses $771 each year in extra vehicle operating costs.

Twelve percent of locally and state-maintained bridges in Nevada show significant deterioration or do not meet current design standards often because of narrow lanes, inadequate clearances or poor alignment. This includes all bridges that are 20 feet or more in length. 

  • Two percent of Nevada’s bridges are structurally deficient. A bridge is structurally deficient if there is significant deterioration of the bridge deck, supports or other major components. Structurally deficient bridges are often posted for lower weight or closed to traffic, restricting or redirecting large vehicles, including commercial trucks and emergency services vehicles. 
  • Ten percent of Nevada’s bridges are functionally obsolete.  Bridges that are functionally obsolete no longer meet current highway design standards, often because of narrow lanes, inadequate clearances or poor alignment.
  • Significant levels of traffic congestion cause significant delays in Nevada, particularly in its larger urban areas, choking commuting and commerce.
  • According to the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI), the average driver in the Las Vegas urban area loses $906 each year in the cost of lost time and wasted fuel as a result of traffic congestion. The average commuter in the Las Vegas urban area loses 44 hours each year stuck in congestion.
  • TTI calculates that the average driver in the Reno-Carson City urban area loses $590 each year in the cost of lost time and wasted fuel as a result of traffic congestion. The average commuter in the Reno-Carson City urban area loses 27 hours each year stuck in congestion.
  • Throughout the state, lost time and wasted fuel due to congestion cost Nevada’s drivers a total of $1.1 billion each year.

Nevada’s traffic fatality rate on rural, non-Interstate routes is more than two-and-a-half times higher than that on all other roads and highways in the state.  Improving safety features on Nevada’s roads and highways would likely result in a decrease in the state’s traffic fatalities and serious crashes. Roadway features are likely a contributing factor in approximately one-third of all fatal and serious traffic crashes.  

  • Between 2007 and 2011, a total of 1,443 people were killed in traffic crashes in Nevada, an average of 289 fatalities per year.
  • Nevada’s overall traffic fatality rate of 1.16 fatalities per 100 million vehicle miles of travel in 2010 is higher than the national average of 1.11.
  • The fatality rate on Nevada’s rural non-Interstate roads was 1.91 fatalities per 100 vehicle miles of travel in 2010, nearly two times higher than the 0.98 fatality rate on all other roads and highways in the state.
  • The cost of serious traffic crashes in Nevada in 2011, in which roadway features were likely a contributing factor, was approximately $508 million. In the Las Vegas urban area, traffic crashes cost the average driver $193 annually, while the average Reno-Carson City motorist loses $337 each year.
  • Roadway features that impact safety include the number of lanes, lane widths, lighting, lane markings, rumble strips, shoulders, guard rails, other shielding devices, median barriers and intersection design.  The cost of serious crashes includes lost productivity, lost earnings, medical costs and emergency services.
  • Several factors are associated with vehicle crashes that result in fatalities, including driver behavior, vehicle characteristics and roadway features.  TRIP estimates that roadway features are a contributing factor in approximately one-third of fatal traffic crashes.
  • Where appropriate, highway improvements can reduce traffic fatalities and crashes while improving traffic flow to help relieve congestion.  Such improvements include removing or shielding obstacles; adding or improving medians; improved lighting; adding rumble strips, wider lanes, wider and paved shoulders; upgrading roads from two lanes to four lanes; and better road markings and traffic signals.
  • Investments in rural traffic safety have been found to result in significant reductions in serious traffic crashes.  A 2012 report by the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) found that improvements completed recently by the Texas Department of Transportation that widened lanes, improved shoulders and made other safety improvements on 1,159 miles of rural state roadways resulted in 133 fewer fatalities on these roads in the first three years after the improvements were completed (as compared to the three years prior).   TTI estimates that the improvements on these roads are likely to save 880 lives over the next 20 years.

The efficiency of Nevada’s transportation system, particularly its highways, is critical to the health of the state’s economy.  Businesses are increasingly reliant on an efficient and reliable transportation system to move products and services. A key component in business efficiency and success is the level and ease of access to customers, markets, materials and workers.

  • Annually, $53 billion in goods are shipped from sites in Nevada and another $77 billion in goods are shipped to sites in Nevada, mostly by truck.
  • Seventy-eight percent of the goods shipped annually from sites in Nevada are carried by trucks and another 18 percent are carried by courier services or multiple mode deliveries, which include trucking.
  • Increasingly, companies are looking at the quality of a region’s transportation system when deciding where to re-locate or expand. Regions with congested or poorly maintained roads may see businesses relocate to areas with a smoother, more efficient and more modern transportation system.
  • Site Selection magazine’s 2010 survey of corporate real estate executives found that transportation infrastructure was the third most important selection factor in site location decisions, behind only work force skills and state and local taxes.
  • A 2007 analysis by the Federal Highway Administration found that every $1 billion invested in highway construction would support approximately 27,800 jobs, including approximately 9,500 in the construction sector, approximately 4,300 jobs in industries supporting the construction sector, and approximately 14,000 other jobs induced in non-construction related sectors of the economy.
  • The Federal Highway Administration estimates that each dollar spent on road, highway and bridge improvements results in an average benefit of $5.20 in the form of reduced vehicle maintenance costs, reduced delays, reduced fuel consumption, improved safety, reduced road and bridge maintenance costs and reduced emissions as a result of improved traffic flow.

Sources of information for this report include the Nevada Department of Transportation (NDOT), the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS), the U.S. Census Bureau, the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).  

TRIP Reports: Des Moines Drivers Waste Nearly $1,400 Each Year Driving On Deficient Roads – A Total Of $1.9 Billion Statewide

TRIPForty-Two Percent Of Iowa Roads Need Improvement, One Quarter Of Bridges Require Repair Or Replacement, And Rural Fatalities Are Disproportionately High

More than two-fifths of Iowa’s major locally and state-maintained roads are in either poor or mediocre condition, the state has the third highest percentage of deficient bridges, and Iowa drivers experience growing congestion and delays. In addition to deteriorated roads and bridges, Iowa’s rural roads have a significantly higher traffic fatality rate than all other roads in the state. Increased investment in transportation improvements could improve road and bridge conditions, ease congestion, boost safety, and support long-term economic growth in Iowa, according to a new report released today by TRIP, a Washington, DC based national transportation organization. The TRIP report, Iowa Transportation by the Numbers: Meeting the State’s Need for Safe and Efficient Mobility,” provides data on key transportation facts and figures in the state.

 

$1.9 billion

 

$1,368

Iowa roadways that lack some desirable safety features, have inadequate capacity to meet travel demands or have poor pavement conditions cost the state’s residents approximately $1.9 billion annually in the form of additional vehicle operating costs, the cost of lost time and wasted fuel due to traffic congestion and traffic crashes. Driving on deficient roads costs the average Des Moines area motorist $1,368 annually.

$215 million

According to the Iowa Department of Transportation, the state faces an annual transportation funding shortfall of $215 million in order to meet the state’s most critical public roadway needs.

42%

 

60%

Forty-two percent of Iowa’s major locally and state- maintained roads and highways are either in poor or mediocre condition.  Sixty percent of Des Moines-area major locally and state- maintained urban roads are in poor or mediocre condition.
395

1,977

From 2007 to 2011, an average of 395 people were killed annually in Iowa traffic crashes, a total of 1,977 fatalities over the five year period.

 

2.5

The fatality rate on Iowa’s non-interstate rural roads is nearly two-and-a-half times higher than on all other roads (1.81 fatalities per 100 million vehicle miles of travel vs. 0.77).

 

27 %

More than a quarter of Iowa bridges are in need of repair, improvement or replacement. Twenty-two percent of the state’s bridges are structurally deficient and five percent are functionally obsolete.

Third

Iowa has the third highest share of structurally deficient bridges in the nation, behind only Pennsylvania and Oklahoma.

36 %

Vehicle miles of travel in Iowa increased 36 percent from 1990 to 2011.

 

 

$1 billion =27,800

A 2007 analysis by the Federal Highway Administration found that every $1 billion invested in highway construction would support approximately 27,800 jobs, including approximately 9,500 in the construction sector, approximately 4,300 jobs in industries supporting the construction sector, and approximately 14,000 other jobs induced in non-construction related sectors of the economy.

 

$1.00 = $5.20

The Federal Highway Administration estimates that each dollar spent on road, highway and bridge improvements results in an average benefit of $5.20 in the form of reduced vehicle maintenance costs, reduced delays, reduced fuel consumption, improved safety, reduced road and bridge maintenance costs, and reduced emissions as a result of improved traffic flow.

“The TRIP report validates the findings of both TIME 21 and Governor Branstad’s Transportation 2020 Commission that more funding for Iowa’s highway infrastructure system is crucial.  The report’s findings underscore the fact that the cost of bad roads has a significantly more adverse economic impact on the driving public than any increase in user fees,” noted David Scott, Executive Director, Iowa Good Roads Association.  Iowa Good Roads Association is part of a larger group of business, agricultural, and development organizations.

Iowa roadways that lack some desirable safety features, have inadequate capacity to meet travel demands or have poor pavement conditions cost the state’s residents approximately $1.9 billion each year in the form of additional vehicle operating costs, the cost of lost time and wasted fuel due to traffic congestion, and traffic crashes. Driving on roads that are congested, deteriorated and that lack some desirable safety features costs the average Des Moines area driver $1,368 annually.

According to the TRIP report, 42 percent of Iowa’s major locally and state-maintained roads are in either poor or mediocre condition. In the Des Moines metro area, 60 percent of roads are in poor or mediocre condition. A total of 27 percent of Iowa’s bridges show significant deterioration or do not meet modern design standards. Twenty-two percent of the state’s bridges are structurally deficient, the third highest total in the nation. Structurally deficient bridges have significant deterioration of the bridge deck, supports or other major components. An additional five percent of Iowa’s bridges are functionally obsolete. These bridges no longer meet current highway design standards, often because of narrow lanes, inadequate clearances or poor alignment.

Growing traffic congestion, particularly in the state’s urban areas, threatens to choke commuting and commerce. The average commuter in the Des Moines metro area loses 27 hours each year stuck in congestion.

Traffic crashes in Iowa claimed the lives of 1,980 people between 2007 and 2011. The state’s traffic fatality rate of 1.23 fatalities per 100 million vehicle miles of travel (VMT) is higher than the national average of 1.11 fatalities per 100 million VMT. However, the traffic fatality rate in 2010 on Iowa’s non-Interstate rural roads was 1.81 traffic fatalities per 100 million vehicle miles of travel, nearly two-and-a-half times higher than the 0.77 traffic fatalities per 100 million vehicle miles of travel on all other roads and highways in the state. Roadway features are likely a contributing factor in approximately one-third of all fatal and serious traffic crashes. Where appropriate, highway improvements can reduce traffic fatalities and crashes while improving traffic flow to help relieve congestion.

“These key transportation numbers in Iowa add up to trouble for the state’s residents in terms of deteriorated roads and bridges, reduced traffic safety and constrained economic development,” said Will Wilkins, executive director of TRIP.  “Improving road and bridge conditions, improving traffic safety and providing a transportation system that will support economic development in Iowa will require a significant boost in state and federal funding for road, highway and bridge improvements.”

Executive Summary:

Iowa Transportation By The Numbers:

Meeting the State’s Need for Safe and Efficient Mobility

Iowa’s extensive system of roads, highways and bridges provides the state’s residents, visitors and businesses with a high level of mobility. This transportation system forms the backbone that supports the state’s economy. Iowa’s surface transportation system enables the state’s residents and visitors to travel to work and school, visit family and friends, and frequent tourist and recreation attractions while providing its businesses with reliable access to customers, materials, suppliers and employees.

As Iowa looks to retain its businesses, maintain its level of economic competitiveness and achieve further economic growth, the state will need to maintain and modernize its roads, highways and bridges by improving the physical condition of its transportation network and enhancing the system’s ability to provide efficient and reliable mobility for motorists and businesses.  Making needed improvements to Iowa’s roads, highways and bridges could also provide a significant boost to the state’s economy by creating jobs in the short term and stimulating long-term economic growth as a result of enhanced mobility and access.

With an unemployment rate of five percent and with the state’s population continuing to grow, Iowa must improve its system of roads, highways and bridges to foster economic growth and keep businesses in the state. In addition to economic growth, transportation improvements are needed to ensure safe, reliable mobility and quality of life for all Iowans.  Meeting Iowa’s need to modernize and maintain its system of roads, highways and bridges will require a significant boost in local, state and federal funding.

An inadequate transportation system costs Iowa residents a total of $1.9 billion every year in the form of additional vehicle operating costs (VOC), congestion-related delays and traffic crashes. Drivers in the Des Moines area lose an average of $1,368 each year due to driving on deteriorated roads.

  • TRIP estimates that Iowa roadways that lack some desirable safety features, have inadequate capacity to meet travel demands or have poor pavement conditions cost the state’s residents approximately $1.9 billion annually in the form of additional vehicle operating costs, the cost of lost time and wasted fuel due to traffic congestion and traffic crashes. Driving on roads that are deteriorated, congested and that lack all desirable safety features costs the average Des Moines area motorist $1,368 annually.
  • TRIP has calculated the annual cost to Iowa residents of driving on roads that are deteriorated, congested and lack some desirable safety features both statewide and in Des Moines.  The following chart shows the cost breakdown both statewide and in Des MoiIowa faces an annual transportation funding shortfall of $215 million in order to make critically needed roadway improvements. The state’s transportation system will become increasingly deteriorated and overburdened unless additional transportation funding can be secured.
  • According to the Iowa Department of Transportation, the state faces an annual transportation funding shortfall of $215 million in order to meet the state’s most critical public roadway needs.
  • Unless the state can close the transportation funding shortfall, Iowa will experience an increasing number of bridge closures and bridges with weight restrictions, deteriorating conditions throughout the system that will impact the movement of goods and people, increased costs to transportation providers and users, and potential economic losses to the state.

Population and economic growth in Iowa have resulted in increased demands on the state’s major roads and highways, leading to increased wear and tear on the transportation system. 

  • Iowa’s population reached 3.1 million in 2012, a 10 percent increase since 1990, when the state’s population was approximately 2.8 million. Iowa had 2,191,715licensed drivers in 2011.
  • Vehicle miles traveled in Iowa increased by 35 percent from 1990 to 2011 – jumping from 23.2 billion vehicle miles traveled (VMT) in 1990 to 31.4 billion VMT in 2011.
  • By 2030, vehicle travel in Iowa is projected to increase by another 20 percent.
  • From 1990 to 2011, Iowa’s gross domestic product, a measure of the state’s economic output, increased by 55 percent, when adjusted for inflation.

Forty-two percent of major locally and state-maintained roads and highways in Iowa have pavement surfaces in poor or mediocre condition, providing a rough ride and costing motorist in the form of additional vehicle operating costs. 

  • Nineteen percent of Iowa’s major roads and highways have pavements in poor condition, while an additional 23 percent of the state’s major roads are rated in mediocre condition.  Nineteen percent are rated in fair condition and the remaining 39 percent are rated in good condition.
  • The 2011 pavement data in this report for all arterial roads and highways is provided by the Federal Highway Administration, based on data submitted annually by the Iowa Department of Transportation (IowaDOT) on the condition of major state and locally maintained roads and highways in the state.
  • In the Des Moines urban area, 38 percent of major locally and state-maintained roads are rated in poor condition and 22 percent are rated in mediocre condition.
  • Roads rated in poor condition may show signs of deterioration, including rutting, cracks and potholes.  In some cases, poor roads can be resurfaced, but often are too deteriorated and must be reconstructed. Roads rated in mediocre condition may show signs of significant wear and may also have some visible pavement distress. Most pavements in mediocre condition can be repaired by resurfacing, but some may need more extensive reconstruction to return them to good condition.
  • Driving on rough roads costs Iowa motorist a total of $910 million annually in extra vehicle operating costs. Costs include accelerated vehicle depreciation, additional repair costs, and increased fuel consumption and tire wear.
  • Driving on rough roads costs the average Des Moines motorist $591 annually in extra vehicle operating costs.

More than a quarter of locally and state-maintained bridges in Iowa show significant deterioration or do not meet current design standards often because of narrow lanes, inadequate clearances or poor alignment. This includes all bridges that are 20 feet or more in length. 

  • Twenty-two percent of Iowa’s bridges are structurally deficient, the third highest rate nationally, behind only Pennsylvania with 25 percent and Oklahoma also with 22 percent.
  • A bridge is structurally deficient if there is significant deterioration of the bridge deck, supports or other major components. Structurally deficient bridges are often posted for lower weight or closed to traffic, restricting or redirecting large vehicles, including commercial trucks and emergency services vehicles. 
  • Five percent of Iowa’s bridges are functionally obsolete.  Bridges that are functionally obsolete no longer meet current highway design standards, often because of narrow lanes, inadequate clearances or poor alignment.

The growing level of traffic congestion is causing mounting delays on Iowa’s roadways, particularly in the state’s larger urban areas.

  • According to the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI), the average driver in the Des Moines urban area loses $585 each year in the cost of lost time and wasted fuel as a result of traffic congestion. The average commuter in the Des Moines urban area loses 27 hours each year stuck in congestion. 
  • The statewide cost of congestion related delays and wasted fuel is $360 million each year.

Iowa’s traffic fatality rate on rural, non-Interstate routes is nearly two-and-a-half times higher than that on all other roads and highways in the state.  Improving safety features on Iowa’s roads and highways would likely result in a decrease in the state’s traffic fatalities and serious crashes. Roadway features are likely a contributing factor in approximately one-third of all fatal and serious traffic crashes.

  • Between 2007 and 2011, a total of 1,977 people were killed in traffic crashes in Iowa, an average of 395 fatalities per year.
  • Iowa’s overall traffic fatality rate of 1.23 fatalities per 100 million vehicle miles of travel in 2010 is higher than the national average of 1.11.
  • The fatality rate on Iowa’s rural non-Interstate roads was 1.81 fatalities per 100 vehicle miles of travel in 2010, nearly two-and-a-half times than the 0.77 fatality rate in 2010 on all other roads and highways in the state.
  • The cost of serious traffic crashes in Iowa in 2011, in which roadway features were likely a contributing factor, was approximately $625 million. In the Des Moines urban area, the cost of serious traffic crashes in which roadway features were likely a contributing factor is approximately $192 per motorist. The cost of serious crashes includes lost productivity, lost earnings, medical costs and emergency services.
  • Roadway features that impact safety include the number of lanes, lane widths, lighting, lane markings, rumble strips, shoulders, guard rails, other shielding devices, median barriers and intersection design.  The cost of serious crashes includes lost productivity, lost earnings, medical costs and emergency services.
  • Several factors are associated with vehicle crashes that result in fatalities, including driver behavior, vehicle characteristics and roadway features.  TRIP estimates that roadway features are likely a contributing factor in approximately one-third of fatal traffic crashes.
  • Where appropriate, highway improvements can reduce traffic fatalities and crashes while improving traffic flow to help relieve congestion.  Such improvements include removing or shielding obstacles; adding or improving medians; improved lighting; adding rumble strips, wider lanes, wider and paved shoulders; upgrading roads from two lanes to four lanes; and better road markings and traffic signals.
  • Investments in rural traffic safety have been found to result in significant reductions in serious traffic crashes.  A 2012 report by the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) found that improvements completed recently by the Texas Department of Transportation that widened lanes, improved shoulders and made other safety improvements on 1,159 miles of rural state roadways resulted in 133 fewer fatalities on these roads in the first three years after the improvements were completed (as compared to the three years prior).   TTI estimates that the improvements on these roads are likely to save 880 lives over the next 20 years.

The efficiency of Iowa’s transportation system, particularly its highways, is critical to the health of the state’s economy.  Businesses are increasingly reliant on an efficient and reliable transportation system to move products and services. A key component in business efficiency and success is the level and ease of access to customers, markets, materials and workers.

  • Annually, $157 billion in goods are shipped from sites in Iowa and another $142 billion in goods are shipped to sites in Iowa, mostly by truck.
  • Eighty-one percent of the goods shipped annually from sites in Iowa are carried by trucks and another seven percent are carried by courier services or multiple mode deliveries, which include trucking.
  • Increasingly, companies are looking at the quality of a region’s transportation system when deciding where to re-locate or expand. Regions with congested or poorly maintained roads may see businesses relocate to areas with a smoother, more efficient and more modern transportation system.
  • Businesses have responded to improved communications and greater competition by moving from a push-style distribution system, which relies on low-cost movement of bulk commodities and large-scale warehousing, to a pull-style distribution system, which relies on smaller, more strategic and time-sensitive movement of goods.
  • Site Selection magazine’s 2010 survey of corporate real estate executives found that transportation infrastructure was the third most important selection factor in site location decisions, behind only work force skills and state and local taxes.
  • A 2007 analysis by the Federal Highway Administration found that every $1 billion invested in highway construction would support approximately 27,800 jobs, including approximately 9,500 in the construction sector, approximately 4,300 jobs in industries supporting the construction sector, and approximately 14,000 other jobs induced in non-construction related sectors of the economy.
  • The Federal Highway Administration estimates that each dollar spent on road, highway and bridge improvements results in an average benefit of $5.20 in the form of reduced vehicle maintenance costs, reduced delays, reduced fuel consumption, improved safety, reduced road and bridge maintenance costs and reduced emissions as a result of improved traffic flow.

Sources of information for this report include the Iowa Department of Transportation (IowaDOT), the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS), the U.S. Census Bureau, the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).